There is a new paper on dolphin molecular phylogeny: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320300282
The paper shows that:
1. Burrunan dolphin is not a valid species (but a good subspecies).
2. Genera Stenella, Delphinus and Lagenodelphis should be lumped (Delphinus has priority). This actually has been clear for some time, but here’s another confirmation.
3. The authors say Tursiops should be kept as separate genus because it’s monophyletic, but I think it should be also subsumed into Delphinus, considering the long history of hybridization.
dolphin phylogeny
Related Articles
-
Lesser grisons
Always thought this would be a really tough animal to see and regretted not joining Richard Webb when he...
-
Various Trip Reports – India, Nepal and Yellowstone – Royle Safaris
Tiger Safari to Bandhavgarh Trip Report – Royle Safaris A trip report from a tiger safari of Bandhavgarh National...
-
Taxonomy news
Just two lumps, but of a kind some people might find interesting: 1. Gould’s mouse (Pseudomys gouldii) isn’t extinct:...
-
And some taxonomy…
Some taxonomy news: North American Water Shrew is a complex of three species (fortunately, I’ve seen all three); here’s a...
-
Spotlight for mammalwatching
Hello, I am looking for a hand-held flashlight or head-lamp for mammalwatching, with very good light (over 800 lumens),...
-
Live trapping animals for research
The following thought provoking and interesting article is from The Wolf Conservation Face Book page. This has been touched...
-
Asiatic Golden Cat colour morphs
This is an interesting summary of a paper written by some ZSL scientists on different colour morphs in Golden...
-
Amazing Bear and Bison footage from Yellowstone
Amazing Bear and Bison footage from Yellowstone While at Yellowstone this past spring I often wondered how often animals...
One thing to note however is that this paper is very very focused on Tursiops, with limited sampling of other relevant taxa, including no Sousa and not all Stenella species. So while all of these taxa (with the exception of Lagenodelphis perhaps) be lumped into Delphinus, I am skeptical we will get much more movement on the area.
Although with more sampling, it wouldn’t surprise me if Lagenodelphis remains valid. Morphologically it is distinct and prior phylogenetic analyses place it as the most basal species within the clade.
I had an undergraduate student a few summers ago that looked at how distinct the skulls of the different dolphins in this subfamily were from one another, using morphometrics. Samples sizes were limited for most species, but Delphinus and Stenella did show a lot of overlap, with Tursiops being very distinct. Need to revisit that project again once I increase my sample sizes.