There is a new paper on dolphin molecular phylogeny: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320300282
The paper shows that:
1. Burrunan dolphin is not a valid species (but a good subspecies).
2. Genera Stenella, Delphinus and Lagenodelphis should be lumped (Delphinus has priority). This actually has been clear for some time, but here’s another confirmation.
3. The authors say Tursiops should be kept as separate genus because it’s monophyletic, but I think it should be also subsumed into Delphinus, considering the long history of hybridization.
dolphin phylogeny
Related Articles
-
Mammalwatching paper
Dear All, I am writing an essay about current and potential importance of amateur mammalwatching for science and conservation;...
-
Sand cat, where to look and with who?
Anyone know any guide, operator or someone else who can help me finding and if possible photograph Sand cat?...
-
Surprise
Hold on, let me move this rock out of the way. http://9gag.com/gag/aZN24D0?ref=android.s.email So that’s how you find one of...
-
Revision to Humpback Dolphin taxonomy
A good deal of work has gone into this study to sort out the genetics of the Sousa genus...
-
New Directory of Advertisers
Anyone who has tried to organize mammal watching in remote areas knows how complicated it can be to find...
-
Bat ID Help
Hi all. I have some bat ID’s I am hoping to get some help with. All of these pictures...
-
Lemmings & Snowy Owls
Given Jon Hall’s new interest in snowy owls: ornithologist Joe Smith on the lemmings behind the snowy owl invasion....
-
Scientific American article on breeding Lumholtz’s tree kangaroo in captivity
Interesting article: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/poop-tree-kangaroo. Leslie
One thing to note however is that this paper is very very focused on Tursiops, with limited sampling of other relevant taxa, including no Sousa and not all Stenella species. So while all of these taxa (with the exception of Lagenodelphis perhaps) be lumped into Delphinus, I am skeptical we will get much more movement on the area.
Although with more sampling, it wouldn’t surprise me if Lagenodelphis remains valid. Morphologically it is distinct and prior phylogenetic analyses place it as the most basal species within the clade.
I had an undergraduate student a few summers ago that looked at how distinct the skulls of the different dolphins in this subfamily were from one another, using morphometrics. Samples sizes were limited for most species, but Delphinus and Stenella did show a lot of overlap, with Tursiops being very distinct. Need to revisit that project again once I increase my sample sizes.