There is a new paper on dolphin molecular phylogeny: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320300282
The paper shows that:
1. Burrunan dolphin is not a valid species (but a good subspecies).
2. Genera Stenella, Delphinus and Lagenodelphis should be lumped (Delphinus has priority). This actually has been clear for some time, but here’s another confirmation.
3. The authors say Tursiops should be kept as separate genus because it’s monophyletic, but I think it should be also subsumed into Delphinus, considering the long history of hybridization.
dolphin phylogeny
Related Articles
-
Sei and Right Whales off of Massachusetts
I’m on a boat heading back into Gloucester, Massachusetts and just had an awesome afternoon whale watching. I was...
-
Ideas for our conservation project – ideal places?
Dear Mammal Watching Community We are two young mammal watchers and therefore, big nature lovers. After a lot of...
-
Weasel ID
Today, I had an amazing observation of a family group of one adult weasel with three young at Assabet...
-
Mammals in the News
A few recent stories that caught my eye. I was expecting some sort of online tool to identify birds...
-
-
Mathews Mountains, Kenya – camera traps
My colleague Tim Boucher has some great camera trap photos and video from his expedition to the Mathews Mountains...
-
Best Kept Secrets
When we were in Colombia, Cheryl Antonucci and I were chatting about which mammalwatching destinations were under visited. Colombia...
-
I Just Offset (some of) My Greenhouse Gas Emissions
I spent Friday afternoon at a meeting on Planetary Health. It was interesting. But mainly terrifying. As we all know...
One thing to note however is that this paper is very very focused on Tursiops, with limited sampling of other relevant taxa, including no Sousa and not all Stenella species. So while all of these taxa (with the exception of Lagenodelphis perhaps) be lumped into Delphinus, I am skeptical we will get much more movement on the area.
Although with more sampling, it wouldn’t surprise me if Lagenodelphis remains valid. Morphologically it is distinct and prior phylogenetic analyses place it as the most basal species within the clade.
I had an undergraduate student a few summers ago that looked at how distinct the skulls of the different dolphins in this subfamily were from one another, using morphometrics. Samples sizes were limited for most species, but Delphinus and Stenella did show a lot of overlap, with Tursiops being very distinct. Need to revisit that project again once I increase my sample sizes.