There is a new paper on dolphin molecular phylogeny: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320300282
The paper shows that:
1. Burrunan dolphin is not a valid species (but a good subspecies).
2. Genera Stenella, Delphinus and Lagenodelphis should be lumped (Delphinus has priority). This actually has been clear for some time, but here’s another confirmation.
3. The authors say Tursiops should be kept as separate genus because it’s monophyletic, but I think it should be also subsumed into Delphinus, considering the long history of hybridization.
dolphin phylogeny
Related Articles
-
Mammals of the world checklist
There is an online checklist available for personal use at http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/ It is a comma delimited list, Excel had...
-
The ultimate mammal watching lens: Nikon 500 mm F5.6 PF ED VR
The ultimate mammal watching lens: Nikon 500 mm F5.6 PF ED VR Maybe some of you remember that I...
-
Authoritative mammal checklist?
What are people’s choices for the authoritative mammal checklist for the world? There are several on the internet including...
-
Pallas Cat video
I’m new here, at least in the forum as I’ve been following the site for some time. I found...
-
Andujar or Somiedo, That is the Question!
Thanks again everyone for all the amazing information on my last request for information for our upcoming wildlife trip...
-
One Last Question About Kruger, Please!
Hi Everyone, Sorry I’m starting a whole new thread for this, but I have one last, 2-part dilemma: So,...
-
Domestic mammals countability
Here’s a summary of domesticated species countability issues. Comments welcome 🙂 http://dinets.info/domestics.pdf Vladimir
-
new mammal finding guide coming for Australia
Out in December in UK, March of 2016 in US edition (which on Amazon will be about half the...
One thing to note however is that this paper is very very focused on Tursiops, with limited sampling of other relevant taxa, including no Sousa and not all Stenella species. So while all of these taxa (with the exception of Lagenodelphis perhaps) be lumped into Delphinus, I am skeptical we will get much more movement on the area.
Although with more sampling, it wouldn’t surprise me if Lagenodelphis remains valid. Morphologically it is distinct and prior phylogenetic analyses place it as the most basal species within the clade.
I had an undergraduate student a few summers ago that looked at how distinct the skulls of the different dolphins in this subfamily were from one another, using morphometrics. Samples sizes were limited for most species, but Delphinus and Stenella did show a lot of overlap, with Tursiops being very distinct. Need to revisit that project again once I increase my sample sizes.