https://www.yahoo.com/news/tall-tale-study-reveals-giraffes-four-species-not-194024390.html
Interesting article on the split of the Giraffe. Nice to add new species without going anywhere:-)
Andrew
Giraffe is now four species
Related Articles
-
New Trip Report: Madagascar
Here’s another report from Phil Gregory – a logistically challenging, but wildlife rich trip. Madagascar, 2015: Phil Gregory, 16...
-
Kenya Rodent ID Help
Hi all. I am finishing up the mammal IDs from our recent trip to Kenya and there are a...
-
New Trip Report – The Congo
A great new report from Cheryl Antonucci from the very cool Congo’s Odzala-Kokoua National Park, – which I now...
-
Need ID for a jackal from Ethiopia
Dear Mammal Watcher, Last November I probably saw a black-backed jackal Lupulella mesomelas in Awash NP in Ethiopia. I...
-
Help with identification of a hare in Kruger NP
Can anyone please help me identify this hare photographed in northern Kruger National Park on 16 Dec 2013? It...
-
Mammals in the News
Just a couple of articles recently that I wanted to share. First, an interesting piece on why Forest Elephants...
-
New Trip Report – Uganda
Trevor Hardaker’s report of a great trip to Uganda with excellent pictures is now linked to mammalwatching.com His report...
-
Sierra Leone – preliminary report
I got back from Sierra Leone a couple days ago. Unfortunately, despite much effort, I did not locate Pygmy...
This is not the first such paper, and it has the same problem as all previous ones: not all subspecies have been sampled. I don’t know why they didn’t sample them all; the missing subspecies are available in captivity. It’s been clear for decades that the 3 subspecies present in Kenya behave like full species; I also suspect that the extreme difference between Maasai and reticulated giraffes is due to character displacement. So it is still unclear how many species are there, and how many subspecies. I think it’s pretty safe to split giraffes into four species at this point, but it remains to be seen if there’s more.
for others, the paper is here: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)30787-4
It clearly says “Our nuclear dataset includes all currently recognized giraffe subspecies… and, importantly, the elusive Nubian giraffe (Giraffa c. camelopardalis).”
Since my previous comments have disappeared, here’s a summary.
1. Sorry, I first looked at a wrong paper. The new one provides sufficient evidence for a 4-way split. I already updated my checklist 🙂
2. But I don’t think they provide sufficient evidence for lumping of some subspecies, and I find the idea of “killing” subspecies that are clearly separate morphologically based on genetic data to be fundamentally flawed and dangerous.