New tiger cat species from Bolivia

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/meet-the-first-new-cat-species-discovered-in-100-years

Who’s going to be the first to add the Tilcayo cat to their life list?

 

Post author

GaryMeaney

11 Comments

  • Eduardo Ruiz

    Probably Alex Meyer if he visits that wildlife sanctuary since he has a list of animals seen in zoos

  • Moses Swanson-Mwamasika

    Scrap everything and go to Bolivia is the current plan

  • Vladimir Dinets

    Any record of L. tigrinus s. l. from Bolivia would be that species according to the paper, so a lot of people should have it already. But the molecular distances appear to be rather small and the proposed biogeography makes little sense, so I’d be careful with accepting this split.

    1
    • Vladimir Dinets

      I think a better interpretation of nuclear DNA data is that tilcayo and pardinoides are subspecies of tigrinus and emiliae is subspecies of guttulus.

      1
      • Kyle Finn

        The divergence times between the species seems equal to that of many of the accepted species of African mole-rats across Fukomys, Cryptomys and Heliophobius, and I think some other rodents but I know the mole-rat literature better (no suprise there). Some of the Fukomys species may be lumped back togther soon, but it’s pretty well accepted there’s two species of Heliophobius and 5 species of Cryptomys. I also thought with WGS you can ‘get more data’ with fewer samples compared to cytb and previous methods. The 2 phylogenys shown for Leopardus are very different though. I’m not taxonomist, my only personal experience with genetic analysis is local relatedness and dispersal analysis.

        • Vladimir Dinets

          Divergence time estimates are always very approximate, but in this case we know that there were no cats at all in South America until <3 mya. Also, cats are much more mobile than mole-rats, so complete speciation takes longer and might never happen at all. If this split eventually gets re-lumped, it wouldn't be the first one in Leopardus – remember the story of L. narinensis?

    • Ben S

      Seconded. A number of genetic studies have split “new” species by sequencing a few geographically separated samples without checking whether there is a gradient of variation. Also, the proposed range map appears to be a guess based on no evidence.

      • Ben S

        I don’t particularly care about listing (I very much enjoyed my Oncilla encounters on the Manu Road and at Cabanas San Isidro independently of whether they represented different taxa), but those that do should consider establishing a checklist committee to independently evaluate the validity of proposed splits. The SACC provides a good model: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm

        • Vladimir Dinets

          The way range maps look in the paper makes it clear they are based on computer modeling, which is always a flawed technique because it’s based on circular reasoning.
          Checklist committees would be cool, but SACC specifically might not be the best example – it’s the most heavily criticized of them all (there are now such committees for birds on all continents), although much of that criticism comes from birders who can’t wait for splits to be accepted so their life lists get longer. There’s a ton of those discussions on birdforum.net.

          • Vladimir Dinets

            Right now MDD kinda serves like such a committee. They sometimes accept splits and species descriptions that are clearly flawed, like “Mustela haidarum” and “Diplomesodon sonnerati”. But at least they have a policy of not accepting splits based entirely on mtDNA.

  • Zhou Fangyi

    This new split species has no significant difference in appearance with other tiger cat species. For mammalwatchers, they can only be judged by distribution, as long as there have been research that the tiger cat in this area is this species.

Leave a Reply